Data Entry Workflows
Table 1
Table
6 / 7
Table 1
Table
Table 1
| Workflow | Advantages | Risks | Appropriate controls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper CRF then database entry | Works during connectivity problems; familiar to many sites | Transcription errors, delayed availability, paper storage risks | Double checks, entry timelines, secure filing, source verification |
| Direct eCRF entry | Real-time validation, faster availability, fewer transcription steps | Device and connectivity dependence, user access risks | User training, offline plan, validation rules, audit review |
| Participant survey | Reduces staff entry burden; captures patient-reported data | Incomplete responses, privacy concerns, misunderstanding questions | Clear wording, survey testing, secure links, helpdesk process |
| Spreadsheet import | Efficient for batch laboratory or operational data | Mapping errors, version confusion, invalid formats | Import templates, validation, import logs, reconciliation |
| eSource integration | Reduces duplicate entry and supports automation | System mapping errors, governance complexity | Data transfer agreements, system validation, reconciliation checks |